Top: Index Previous: Affy Quality Up: Microarray Practical Next: Probe Level Models

CSC8309 -- Gene Expression and Proteomics

RNA Degradation

RNA tends to degrade very easily; in general, it degrades from both ends, but worse from the 3' end.

Fortunately, the soybean chips have multiple probes to each gene. There are a variety of reasons for this, but one advantage is that we can ask questions about how degraded the RNA is by comparing the average intensity of spots relative to their position. The RNA degradation plot achieves this.

act

Evaluate this code:

## Construct RNA degradation plots and summary
library('affy')
par(mfrow = c(1,1))
RNAdeg <- AffyRNAdeg(soy.ab)
plotAffyRNAdeg(RNAdeg, col = c(rep('blue',3), rep('red', 3)))
summaryAffyRNAdeg(RNAdeg)


(Complete File)(Rout)

The end product should look like this

There is a lot of debate about how useful these plots actually are. The problem is that, while it's clear that a straight-line would be nice, in practice it never happens, and there are few clear guidelines for how steep a slope is "too bad".

quest
  1. Can you find some of the debate on this issue?
  2. Why are we worried about RNA degradation, when most of the time we are using cDNA?
  3. Can you find other techniques to check for RNA degradation, as opposed to these plots.

Top: Index Previous: Affy Quality Up: Microarray Practical Next: Probe Level Models